{"id":271,"date":"2011-09-27T04:25:29","date_gmt":"2011-09-27T04:25:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ua-cpas.com\/blog\/?p=271"},"modified":"2011-09-27T04:25:29","modified_gmt":"2011-09-27T04:25:29","slug":"gift-tax-valuation-discounts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/2011\/09\/27\/gift-tax-valuation-discounts\/","title":{"rendered":"Gift Tax Valuations enjoy new IRS Loophole"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With the current low asset values and the estate\/ gift- tax exemption slated to be reduced to $1 million in 2013 (from its current $5 million level), many are considering sheltering their assets by making large gifts. A prevalent concern is the valuation of these large gifts. What if the IRS challenges your estimate and wants more gift taxes? In Estate of Petter vs Commisioner, a popular technique to sidestep gift taxes was affirmed.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>In 1982, Ann Petter inherited United Parcel Service stock from an uncle who was among the company\u2019s first investors.\u00a0 In May 2001, when the gift and estate tax rate was 55%, she held $22 million of stock. Estate planners advised Ms. Petter to transfer all of the stock into an LLC. This lowers the value of the stock shares when they are sold or given away, because no one member of the LLC has controlling interest. Ms. Petter subsequently transferred all the stock from the LLC to her two children, claiming that the transfer to the LLC entitled her to a 51% discount on the gifted stock\u2019s value.<\/p>\n<p>The IRS challenged Ms. Petter\u2019s estimate, and the two parties ultimately settled on a 36% discount. When the IRS demanded the gift tax on the shares above the gift tax exemption, however, Ms. Petter exposed a major loophole in the current gift tax regulations. She demonstrated to the IRS that she had specified that should the shares exceed the gift tax threshold, any shares above that threshold would bounce to her IRS-registered charity, resulting in no gift tax due. The court sided with Ms. Petter, allowing the shares to go to her charities.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to sidestepping the gift tax, Ms. Petters\u2019s victory creates a dilemma for the IRS, as it minimizes its incentive to audit. \u201cThe IRS\u2019s real fear,\u201d says retired tax expert Tom Ochsenschlager, \u201cis that without audits, taxpayers could get away with murder on valuations.\u201d Some are warning that the IRS may invalidate the use of Ms. Petter\u2019s strategy by amending its regulations accordingly. They advise those taxpayers interested in taking advantage of this loophole to act soon.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0To read the entire case click here <a href=\"http:\/\/ua-cpas.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/09\/PettervIRSgifttaxes1.pdf\">Petter v Commissioner<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gift Tax Valuation discount was audited by IRS. Discount was reduced making value of gift greater. Amount of gift in excess of gift tax threshold went to charity, thereby avoiding the gift tax.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[30,31,6,13],"tags":[52,103],"class_list":{"0":"post-271","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-business-valuations","7":"category-business-valuations-litigation-support","8":"category-estate-trusts-guardianships","9":"category-litigation-support","10":"tag-business-valuations","11":"tag-gift-taxes","12":"entry"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/271\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ua-cpas.com\/blog\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}