• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Header Right

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Alimony

Creative Advanced Divorce Tax Tip – Monetizing NOLs

July 13, 2014 by Admin

All family law attorneys understand the basics of income taxation as it relates to a marital dissolution: Alimony is taxable to the recipient and deductible by the payor and child support is not taxable.

In complex cases with closely held businesses, it’s important the attorney (or an expert) review not only the business tax returns, but, the personal income tax returns as well.

If one spouse owns all or part of a pass-through entity such as a Subchapter S or Partnership, there may be hidden assets not usually found on the marital balance sheet. Those assets are called Net Operating Losses (NOLs) carry-forwards.

Taxpayers can carry back these losses two years (and get refunds) and/or elect to carry them forward against future income. (NOLs can be carried forward twenty years.)

Well, guess what? When assets are split, the NOLs travel with the business owner. And, assuming its material, they have a value which needs to be monetized. Why does it have value? Because it will save the business owner spouse $ X amount of taxes over the next twenty (or less).

A very, very simple example. The couple divorces and a $1,000,000 NOL travels with the husband. (No you can’t split the NOL) The non-titled spouse’s lawyer never thought to monetize the NOL (or even the expert CPA, who is a generalist without matrimonial litigation experience).

Two years after the divorce the company turns around and the owner spouse has income of $200,000. Pick your bracket, whether it’s 28% or 35% or 40% (I rounded.). The NOL was could be worth somewhere between $56,000 and $80,000. Three years after the divorce, the owner spouse has income of $200,000. Another $56,000 to $80,000. You get the picture. What if all the NOL is used? That can be a savings of possibly as much $400,000.

Failure to monetize this asset and award the non-titled spouse an off-set, can be the basis of a malpractice suit!

Filed Under: Alimony, DIVORCE FORUM, Property Settlement Agreements Tagged With: Divorce, Net Operating Losses

Improved Lifestyle After Your Breakup? It Could Cost You in Alimony

May 17, 2013 by Admin

When it comes to the modification or termination of alimony as a result of cohabitation, financial assistance received from the new cohabiter is not the only factor taken into consideration. The New Jersey Appellate Court recently upheld its ruling that indirect economic benefits may be considered as well.

In Reese v. Weis, Defendant Rebecca Weis was receiving $100k annually in alimony from her ex-husband Ronald Reese since their divorce in 1996. In 1998 she began cohabiting with William Stein and his two children. Ronald filed a motion in 2008 to terminate his obligation to pay alimony citing the defendant’s cohabitation. The trial judge determined that defendant’s 10-year cohabitation afforded her significant benefit such as that alimony was no longer warranted. Defendant cross-appealed the ruling, claiming that her monthly contribution to a joint account she held with Stein, in an amount equal to what she received as support from Plaintiff, coupled with proof of annual expenses exceeding the provided support proved she paid her way without Stein’s economic assistance. She also argued that the luxuries and gifts that accompanied her new lifestyle with William should not be considered an economic benefit to terminate her alimony.

The Court however upheld its ruling, rejecting her claim that her enhanced lifestyle should not be a part of the alimony equation. The panel stated to the contrary, that economic benefits, such as when the cohabitant pays for housing costs, as well as more subtle economic benefits, may legitimately be taken into consideration.   

 

Filed Under: Alimony, Alternative Dispute Resolution, DIVORCE FORUM Tagged With: Alimony, Divorce

NJ Court Rules Discretionary Trust not Included in Alimony Calculation

September 23, 2012 by Admin

The alimony statute, N.J.S.A. 2A:34-23, in determining an alimony award considers “the income available to either party through investment of any assets held by that party.” The question that arose in Tannen v. Tannen, a New Jersey Appellate Division case, is whether income from a discretionary trust falls under the category of “income available”. [Read more…] about NJ Court Rules Discretionary Trust not Included in Alimony Calculation

Filed Under: Alimony, DIVORCE FORUM Tagged With: Alimony, Divorce

Alimony Article in NJ Family Lawyer Written by Jeffrey Urbach

July 17, 2012 by Admin

Our litigation support partner Jeffrey Urbach has co-authored a just-released article for the New Jersey Family Lawyer magazine, June 2012 edition. The article, entitled “Alimony and Taxes,” discusses the basic rules governing alimony as well as lesser known fine points. Jeff covers alimony recapture rules, deductibility of attorneys’ fees, using QDROs to enforce alimony, and alimony trusts. [Read more…] about Alimony Article in NJ Family Lawyer Written by Jeffrey Urbach

Filed Under: Alimony, DIVORCE FORUM, LITIGATION SUPPORT, Taxes Tagged With: Alimony, Divorce

Got a Raise? It Could Cost You in Alimony

November 8, 2011 by Admin

When calculating alimony, most would assume that the calculation would be based upon the breadwinner’s income prior to the divorce. After all, why should the ex-spouse benefit from business success earned after their relationship has been legally severed? In a surprising verdict, however, Superior Court Judge Lawrence Jones ruled against this assumption. [Read more…] about Got a Raise? It Could Cost You in Alimony

Filed Under: Alimony Tagged With: Alimony, Divorce

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2

Primary Sidebar

Search

Category

  • Alimony
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • BUSINESS FORUM
  • Business Valuations
  • Business Valuations
  • Business Valuations
  • Diversion of Assets
  • DIVORCE FORUM
  • Elder Care
  • Employee Classification
  • Estate Taxes
  • ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP
  • Financial Abuse of Elderly
  • Fraud
  • Guardianships
  • Hot Topics
  • Income Taxes
  • Income Taxes
  • Joint Accounts
  • LITIGATION SUPPORT
  • Management
  • MEDICAL PRACTICES
  • NJ Assistance
  • Non-Profits
  • OSHA Requirements
  • Overtime Pay
  • Payroll Taxes
  • Property Settlement Agreements
  • Sales Tax
  • Social Media
  • STAFFING AGENCIES
  • Tax Fraud
  • TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported Income
  • Wage & Hour Violations
  • Wills- Probate

Copyright © 2011 · https://www.ua-cpas.com/blog