Header Right

Admin

Life Insurance Proceeds: Name your Heirs or the Government Shares!

by

Do you have a life insurance policy without a specified beneficiary (other than your estate)?  Are you leaving your estate (residuary estate) to individuals other than a spouse or child?

Many people assume life insurance proceeds, regardless of who the beneficiary is, are exempt from NJ Inheritance tax.  Therefore, even if they are leaving their estate to a beneficiary who is not a spouse or child, they see no need to designate a beneficiary for the life insurance policy.  However, life insurance left to an estate where the ultimate beneficiary is not a spouse or child is not exempt from NJ Inheritance tax.  As NJ Inheritance taxes can be as high as 16%,  it is prudent to take the simple step of naming a beneficiary to avoid the NJ Inheritance Tax. 

Unfortunately life insurance policies owned by individuals are includable for NJ Estate tax purposes, regardless of who is named as the beneficiary, if the assets of the estate are at least $675,000 (not an uncommon scenario for an insured decedent).  However, unless you cherish Chris Christie more than your loved ones, you can at least avoid paying NJ Inheritance taxes by simply naming an individual as beneficiary on your life insurance policy.     

Let’s illustrate:                                                              

Example #1: Uncle Harry dies and names his nephew in his will as sole heir of his entire estate. His only asset is a $500,000 life insurance policy. Since his estate is less than $675,000 there is no US or NJ Estate tax. If he named his nephew as beneficiary of his life insurance policy, there is no NJ Inheritance tax as well. However, if there is no named beneficiary (the estate is the beneficiary), the $500,000 is subject to a 15% inheritance tax, or $75,000.

Example #2: Same as above, except the policy is $1,000,000. NJ law states that the estate calculates the estate tax and the inheritance tax and pays the greater of the two, not both. The NJ Estate tax on $1,000,000 is $33,000. If Uncle Harry named his nephew as beneficiary, the inheritance tax is zero and the estate pays $33,200. If Uncle Harry did not name his nephew as beneficiary, the inheritance tax is 15-16% of $1,000,000 or $153,000. The Estate pays $153,000. The cost of not naming a beneficiary is $119,800 ($153,000 less $33,200).

 

Jeff Urbach Appointed to Board of Directors of IACVA

by

Jeffrey D. Urbach was recently appointed to the Board of Directors of the International Association of Consultants, Valuators, and Analysts, IACVA ( www.iacva.org ). IACVA will be hosting a welcome booth as part of the annual NACVA Conference in Washington in June.  IACVA is offering an all-day training for its members from China. Jeff will be speaking on the topic of preparing valuation reports for Court use to a special delegation from China of over 30 financial experts, most of whom, like Jeff, hold advanced credentials such as the CVA.

Jeff, a Certified Valuation Analyst, specializes in several areas including business valuation, gifting/retirement planning, and healthcare practices (financial management, benchmarking, and valuation of practice).

Attention NJ Employers: 2013 FLINT Deadline is June 23rd

by

What is the Flint assessment?

The NJ DOL borrowed money from the federal government to pay Unemployment Insurance Benefits. NJ law requires the government to pass on the interest costs of the loan to NJ employers.

Is this something new?

It’s comparatively new. This is the third year of the assessment.

How much is it?

The assessment is 0.73% of employer unemployment contributions made for 2012. The minimum assessment is $5. You should have received a bill in the mail recently. However, if you thought it was junk mail or moved and did not inform the state of your new address you might not have received it. It’s due June 23, after which it will accrue a 15% interest penalty, and you won’t know about it until NJ sends you a delinquency notice. Ouch!

How do I pay it?

Payment options include:

  • Check or money order payable to: NJDOLWD
  • EFT
  • E-check
  • Credit Card

To make a payment online, click here: NJ Division of Revenue On-Line Filing Service

 

Improved Lifestyle After Your Breakup? It Could Cost You in Alimony

by

When it comes to the modification or termination of alimony as a result of cohabitation, financial assistance received from the new cohabiter is not the only factor taken into consideration. The New Jersey Appellate Court recently upheld its ruling that indirect economic benefits may be considered as well.

In Reese v. Weis, Defendant Rebecca Weis was receiving $100k annually in alimony from her ex-husband Ronald Reese since their divorce in 1996. In 1998 she began cohabiting with William Stein and his two children. Ronald filed a motion in 2008 to terminate his obligation to pay alimony citing the defendant’s cohabitation. The trial judge determined that defendant’s 10-year cohabitation afforded her significant benefit such as that alimony was no longer warranted. Defendant cross-appealed the ruling, claiming that her monthly contribution to a joint account she held with Stein, in an amount equal to what she received as support from Plaintiff, coupled with proof of annual expenses exceeding the provided support proved she paid her way without Stein’s economic assistance. She also argued that the luxuries and gifts that accompanied her new lifestyle with William should not be considered an economic benefit to terminate her alimony.

The Court however upheld its ruling, rejecting her claim that her enhanced lifestyle should not be a part of the alimony equation. The panel stated to the contrary, that economic benefits, such as when the cohabitant pays for housing costs, as well as more subtle economic benefits, may legitimately be taken into consideration.   

 

Prevent Headaches with our Free Physician’s Financial Checklist

by

Maintaining a medical practice is becoming increasingly challenging from a financial standpoint. There are so many details to keep track of, and they are constantly evolving. Urbach and Avraham is proud to offer a free comprehensive physician’s financial checklist to help with this task. Our checklist, which is geared to the sole-practitioner as well as to larger medical practices, will help you:

  • Reduce your taxes
  • Secure your assets
  • Take advantage of various tax credit opportunities
  • Prepare your budget
  • Address compliance issues including DOL and sales tax issues
  • Grow and transition your medical practice

To view our physician’s checklist, click here:   Physician’s Financial Checklist