• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Header Right

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact

Taxes

Hit by the NJ Exit Tax for Selling Real Estate? Recover Your Money Quickly

October 31, 2013 by Admin

If you’re a non-resident selling investment real estate in New Jersey, there’s a unique NJ tax you should be aware of. Both residents and non-residents always had to pay income tax on the gain upon the sale of real estate. This tax is required to be withheld for non-residents.  The “Exit Tax”, which came into law six years ago, requires the seller to file a GIT/REP form (Gross Income Tax form) in order to record a Deed for the transfer of his property. When a non-resident sells the property, New Jersey will withhold this income tax in the amount of either 8.97 percent of the profit or 2 percent of the total selling price, whichever is higher. Therefore, even if the property is sold at a loss, tax must be withheld to fulfill the two percent requirement.

You Can Recover Your Money

It’s important to realize that while the Exit Tax requires a substantial withholding, it doesn’t have any impact on the tax liability. When the seller eventually files his NJ tax return he is refunded the difference between what was withheld and what was owed. This recovery can be very significant when one factors in the selling costs and original purchase price, both of which reduce the taxable gain.

Estates Often Recover Most if Not All of the Tax Withheld

The recovery is often even greater in the case of real estate sold by an estate, as there is a step up in cost basis which would typically minimize a gain on the sale, often resulting in full recovery of the entire withholding. If a taxpayer has excess withholding it would be prudent to file Form NJ1040 (individual) or NJ1041 (estate) quickly to expedite the recovery of the excess withholding. 

 So who’s considered a “resident” and who’s a “non-resident” with regard to this tax? The law defines a resident taxpayer as one of the following:

  • An individual who is and intends to continue to maintain a permanent place of abode (home, residence) in New Jersey on/after the day of transfer
  • An estate established under the laws of New Jersey
  • A trust established under the laws of New Jersey

A nonresident is simply defined as “any taxpayer that does not meet the definition of resident taxpayer.”

 

Filed Under: BUSINESS FORUM, ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP, TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS, Taxes Tagged With: estate tax, Estate Tax Planning, Income Tax Planning, NJ Exit Tax

Are you in Business or is it Just a Hobby?

July 9, 2013 by Admin

Whether an activity is classified as a business or a hobby can make a significant difference when it comes to taxes. Hobby losses are subject to “hobby loss rules”, under which the deductible expenses are limited to the amount of income generated by the activity. Even the expenses that can be deducted are subject to a 2% of adjusted gross income (AGI) floor. Deductions from business activity income, however, may exceed income and are fully deductible.

 To illustrate, let’s suppose John, a photographer, decided to start a side business, taking pictures at weekend weddings. He earned $4,000 and incurred travel expenses of $3,000 and supply expenses of $2,000. If John’s side job is classified as a business activity he may deduct both expenses to arrive at a $1,000 loss. If it’s classified as a hobby, however, he may only deduct expenses to the extent of his earnings $4,000(assuming those expenses exceed the 2% of AGI floor), and no loss would be allowed. 

While the difference is clear in terms of the tax ramifications, whether or not to classify an activity as a hobby is a rather complex matter.

For an activity to be considered a business, it must be engaged in for profit. How will the IRS determine the intent of the business owner? Here are several factors they consider:

  • How the activity is handled – To be considered a business an activity must be conducted in a businesslike manner. The taxpayer can establish this by maintaining separate personal and business bank accounts, and keeping records and books, maintaining a website

 

  • Historic performance- A long streak of losses indicates a hobby, whereas sustained earnings indicate a for-profit activity

 

  • Nature of the activity- If the activity can provide some sort of recreation or other personal motive, it points to hobby status. If, however, there is no conceivable personal motive it points to business activity

 

These are only a few of many factors the IRS may consider. We recommend that you consult with a tax professional to determine the proper classification of your business activity.

Filed Under: BUSINESS FORUM, TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS, Taxes Tagged With: Business Loss, Hobby loss, Individual Income Tax, Tax Tips for Individuals

IRS Offers New Simplified Option for ‘Office in the Home’ Deduction

July 3, 2013 by Admin

Beginning 2013, the Internal Revenue Service is offering a simplified method that many owners of home-based businesses and some home-based workers may use to figure their deductions for the business use of their homes.

The new optional deduction is capped at $1,500 per year based upon $5 a square foot for up to 300 square feet. This will serve to reduce the paperwork and recordkeeping burden on small businesses.

While the new safe-harbor may be more convenient, in many cases the traditional ‘office in the home’ deduction would yield a greater tax savings. Between mortgage interest, real estate tax and utilities, many taxpayers exceed the $1,500 cap of the new deduction. The new deduction also has the disadvantage that if it would result in a loss it cannot be taken. This is in contrast to a regular office in the home deduction, which can result in a loss carry-forward. The new deduction also cannot be combined with a loss that is carried forward from the previous year.  

Filed Under: TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS, Taxes Tagged With: Business Use of Home, Form 8829, Individual Income Tax, Office in The Home, Tax Update

Supreme Court Decision Impacts Same-Sex Couples

June 28, 2013 by Admin

The Supreme Court’s ruling that a key component of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional was perceived by most as a victory for same-sex couples. The Court decided to leave the definition of a “marriage” to the States, 12 of which currently permit same-sex marriages. Same-sex couples living in one of those states will now be entitled to the same federal benefits as traditional couples. The 12 states include NY and all of the New England states, MD and DE. This has many far-reaching implications, including:

  • Medical insurance coverage will become more affordable, as they will now be recognized as a married couple. Employers must offer insurance to same-sex spouses of employees in the 12 states.

 

  •  They will be able to file jointly on their federal tax returns to ensure tax savings, and will be able to amend prior year tax returns (most likely as far back as 3 years).

 

  • Federal benefits, such as Social Security, military and veteran benefits, pension and health benefits for federal employees will be available.  

 

  • The federal gift and estate tax marital deduction will be available to same sex married couples. As a result, they will be able to transfer assets between one another without payment of a transfer tax. This also means they can amend prior year estate tax returns to claim refunds previously disallowed due to DOMA.

 

 Sounds like cause for celebration, right? Welcome to married life. While the ruling is clearly a victory for equality, it actually has a negative tax implication for many same-sex couples. They will now be subject to the “marriage penalty,” a penalty that has become more significant due to several recent changes in tax law. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), for example, an additional 0.9% Medicare tax on wages and self-employment income, as well as a 3.8% tax on investment income will be imposed. While the threshold is $200,000 for a single taxpayer, married taxpayers only get a $250,000 threshold. As a result of this ruling, many married same-sex couples that would have previously avoided the new tax by filing their federal income tax returns separately will now have to pay the tax.

All this is just the beginning. With over 1,000 federal rules and regulations that need rewriting, aside from tax, time will tell just how far reaching the implications will be.

 

Filed Under: BUSINESS FORUM, Estate Taxes, STAFFING AGENCIES, Taxes Tagged With: Defense of Marriage Act, DOMA, estate tax, gift tax, income tax, Same-sex married couples

Hurricane Sandy Repairs Subject to NJ Sales Tax?

June 10, 2013 by Admin

After Hurricane Sandy hit, the NJ Division of Taxation was flooded (no pun intended) with inquiries regarding the taxability of repairs. As a result, a helpful “Sales and Use Tax – Frequently Asked Questions” page has been added to its website. This article has the answers, including whether charges for demolition services or tree removal are subject to NJ Sales Tax. To view the article, click here: NJ Division of Taxation FAQ

Filed Under: BUSINESS FORUM, TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS, Taxes Tagged With: Sales & Use Tax

Budgeting for 2013 FUTA Payments

December 12, 2012 by Admin

The “standard” current FUTA tax rate is 0.6%. However, the rate could be higher under certain circumstances. When a state lacks the funds to pay UI benefits, as was the case for New Jersey in 2011 and 2012, it may obtain loans from the federal government. If the loan is not repaid within a certain time period, wages paid in that state are subject to higher FUTA tax rates.

In 2011, as a result of the federal loan, the FUTA rate on New Jersey wages was 0.9% instead of 0.6% on wages up to $7,000. Since New Jersey has not repaid its loan from Uncle Sam in 2012; the rate increases from 0.9% to 1.2% retroactively as of January 1, 2012.

The important issue here is that payments so far in the first three quarters of 2012 were only required at the “standard” rate of 0.6%. The difference between 1.2% and the 0.6% that was actually paid plus the fourth quarter at 1.2% is due January 31, 2013 for all of 2012. If you remember getting hit with a large FUTA deposit requirement in January 2012, the 2013 hit will be double since last year you paid for a 0.3% increase over the “standard” rate and in 2012 you are paying a 0.6% increase over the “standard” rate.

This increase should be taken into consideration by businesses in which labor is a major component of cost of goods sold, such as staffing agencies and construction companies, when doing year end budgeting. Make sure you account for this tax payment in your January 2013 cash flow considerations.

 Unless NJ repays the loan in 2013, the penalty tax will increase again to 0.9% for 2013. You might want to budget for this in your April, July and October 2013 FUTA payments.

 

 

 

 

 

Filed Under: BUSINESS FORUM, Payroll Taxes, STAFFING AGENCIES, Taxes Tagged With: Payroll Taxes, Tax Planning

  • « Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • …
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • …
  • Page 15
  • Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Search

Category

  • Alimony
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • BUSINESS FORUM
  • Business Valuations
  • Business Valuations
  • Business Valuations
  • Diversion of Assets
  • DIVORCE FORUM
  • Elder Care
  • Employee Classification
  • Estate Taxes
  • ESTATE, TRUST, GUARDIANSHIP
  • Financial Abuse of Elderly
  • Fraud
  • Guardianships
  • Hot Topics
  • Income Taxes
  • Income Taxes
  • Joint Accounts
  • LITIGATION SUPPORT
  • Management
  • MEDICAL PRACTICES
  • NJ Assistance
  • Non-Profits
  • OSHA Requirements
  • Overtime Pay
  • Payroll Taxes
  • Property Settlement Agreements
  • Sales Tax
  • Social Media
  • STAFFING AGENCIES
  • Tax Fraud
  • TAX TIPS FOR INDIVIDUALS
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Taxes
  • Uncategorized
  • Unreported Income
  • Wage & Hour Violations
  • Wills- Probate

Copyright © 2012 · https://www.ua-cpas.com/blog